<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Acts of Faith In Love &#38; Life &#187; Sexism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://actsoffaithblog.com/topics/sexism/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://actsoffaithblog.com</link>
	<description>Encouraging You To Be YOU In All Of Your Fabulousness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does Ashley Judd Think She&#8217;s The Rosa Parks Of Patriarchy?</title>
		<link>http://actsoffaithblog.com/does-ashley-judd-think-shes-the-rosa-parks-of-patriarchy</link>
		<comments>http://actsoffaithblog.com/does-ashley-judd-think-shes-the-rosa-parks-of-patriarchy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Faith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interracial Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racio-Misogyny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white hegemony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actsoffaithblog.com/?p=4986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p> <p>Victim or Victimhood Peddler? </p> <p align="JUSTIFY">Puffy or Not Is Ashley Judd The Real Face Of Sexism?</p> <p style="text-align: justify;" align="JUSTIFY">Poor Ashley is having a very public moment. Maybe she&#8217;s going through something privately that&#8217;s making her a little extra-sensitive these days. I can&#8217;t imagine why she&#8217;d take the time to write an entire [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><img class="alignnone" title="vv" src="http://blog.sfgate.com/dailydish/files/2012/04/Paley-Center-Screening-of-Missing.JPEG-0f933-219x300.jpg" alt="" width="154" height="200" /></span></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: xx-small;">Victim or Victimhood Peddler?<br />
</span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Puffy or Not Is Ashley Judd The Real Face Of Sexism?</span></span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;" align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Poor Ashley is having a <em>very public</em> moment. Maybe she&#8217;s going through something privately that&#8217;s making her a little extra-sensitive these days. I can&#8217;t imagine why she&#8217;d take the time to write an entire <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/04/09/ashley-judd-slaps-media-in-the-face-for-speculation-over-her-puffy-appearance.html">essay</a> about what she purports is a ra-ra sisterhood stance combating misogyny and body-shaming if she&#8217;s as rooted as she claims: </span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000080;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> The only thing that matters is how I feel about myself, my personal integrity, and my relationship with my Creator.</span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Now that television outlets have picked up on the story this is becoming a huge media circus going into Week Two &#8211; amongst those who have <strong>time</strong> to pay attention. Some people would have women believing we&#8217;re lesser-than, oppressed and victims under-siege with <strong>no</strong> recourse. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">This time what we need to reassess and discard isn&#8217;t part of <em>Blackistan Thought Propaganda</em> but a lopsided, distorted <em>feminist</em> ideology. To me all of her <em>righteous indignation</em> reads more like <strong>self-indulgent posturing</strong> that&#8217;s an emotional response for not being considered a <em><strong>Sexy Young Thang</strong> </em>anymore<em>.<br />
</em></span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><em></em> **Begins crocodile tears and a pout.</span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span id="more-4986"></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">She has a mid-season replacement action thriller about a former CIA operative to promote. Since the ratings have dropped, it isn&#8217;t likely to be renewed. I didn&#8217;t notice that she looked as if she&#8217;s had any work done in the episodes that have aired so far. Which might have changed during her press tour and why she responded.  Her gorgeous co-star <del>sidekick character who&#8217;s not big and loud but downtrodden with relationship issues</del> Aunjenue Ellis is the same age (43) and you&#8217;d be hard-pressed to notice. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Black women tend to age much <strong>better</strong>. It&#8217;s one of the only benefits we get: melanin and oily skin slows the aging process to a crawl. Of course that “double-burden&#8221; of gendered sexism adds unnecessary stress. Wanna trade places Ashley? Doubt it! </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Affirmative Action For White Women Is Par For The Course</span></span></strong></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Understand, my analysis is not a <em>complaint but an observation</em> of certain systems in place. Due to built-in statuses, some of these <strong>arguments about patriarchal oppression is really a power grab</strong>. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The fact that </span></span><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">&#8220;women and minorities&#8221;</span></span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> is part of the social lexicon shows how much has already been won for them. African-American women in particular paid a high price to build this country. Furthermore, the beatings, rapes and abuse the matriarchs specifically endured to secure Civil Rights legislation only to see non-blacks and black immigrants collectively advance in accessing those treasures cannot be ignored. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">White women automatically being added to EEOC categories </span></span><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">ensured their seat at the table</span></span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> with their so-called &#8216;oppressors&#8217;. So does control of every &#8216;feminist&#8217; organization. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Aging is part of life, but it&#8217;s really hard for beauty queens and actresses, especially American white actresses to age gracefully. I know &#8211; it&#8217;s because Hollywood is sexist  &#8211; cue the violins &#8211; except for all those pesky <strong>opportunities automatically afforded</strong> them they rarely acknowledge.</span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">It is not a level playing field. There is no &#8216;equality&#8217;. We&#8217;re not the same. Women don&#8217;t always take the high road with each other. That&#8217;s life. The sooner we stop pretending, more women will <strong>better negotiate alliances</strong> and decide the parameters of their support.</span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong>Racism and Sexism Intersect Or Hadn&#8217;t You Heard?</strong></span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Ashley Judd is a wealthy woman of privilege. She&#8217;s been a celebrity most of her adult life. She has a hot husband. For all her criticism <del>of misogyny and anti-patriarchy </del></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><del>blah blah blah my eyes are gonna glaze over</del></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> she most certainly wasn&#8217;t complaining </span></span><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">when circumstances benefited her</span></span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">. With all due respect to her long illustrious career, I can&#8217;t recall one breakout role of hers. All I recall is her <strong>famous last name</strong>. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">You know I could have written a response hailing Judd, that supported this </span></span><em><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">down with &#8216;the man&#8217;</span></span></em><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> attitude and gotten picked up by </span></span><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">some <del>white privilege oriented</del></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> feminist blogs, but that obscures the need for other women to</span></span><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> better strategize for fuller lives</span></span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">. When assessing true allies transparency and reciprocity are </span></span><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">required</span></span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">. I&#8217;m </span></span><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">indifferent</span></span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> to her plight because </span></span><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">she threw black women under the bus</span></span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> last year. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Apparently some of the repeat offending DBR (c)rappers took umbrage to the potential conscious-raising attention from her ACCURATE assessment about the </span></span><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Hip Hop Industrial Complex</span></span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> promoting rape culture briefly mentioned in her memoirs. Of course everyone and their mama knows this is about <strong>black male assaults against black women</strong>, but it </span></span><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">benefits white women to remain silent</span></span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">. It certainly benefited Judd.</span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Another essay excerpt: </span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000080;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Patriarchy is a system in which both women and men participate. It privileges, inter alia, the interests of boys and men over the bodily integrity, autonomy, and dignity of girls and women. It is subtle, insidious, and never more dangerous than when women passionately deny that they themselves are engaging in it.</span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">When a few of them whined to the press last year, she quickly proffered a public recanting with Russell Simmons of all people.  April 2011 – <a href="http://globalgrind.com/style/ashley-judd-doesnt-want-hip-hop-beef?page=2">Ashley Judd Doesn&#8217;t Want A Hip-Hop Beef</a> </span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000080;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">We are either part of the problem, or part of the solution. There is no in-between.</span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">So she has <strong>full understanding</strong> of misogyny when it applies to </span></span><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">her</span></span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> personal life, but can&#8217;t connect the dots when it comes to other women. Okay Ashley. <strong>I&#8217;m gonna play dumb</strong>, too. Let&#8217;s start a prayer circle for a rich, famous white woman who is an Executive Producer and lead in her own tv series, married, supported, &#8220;usually wrinkle-free&#8221; AND a size 2/4 because the world isn&#8217;t falling down in worship. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Satisfied now? </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">One could argue she didn&#8217;t stick to her point with the DBRs lest (false) race accusations got the way, but I think she could have articulated <strong>RACIO-MISOGYNY.</strong> Gosh, if she can&#8217;t take that small amount of criticism, she&#8217;d never be able to survive the <strong>full-on assault</strong> black women have had to endure.</span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">I&#8217;m not saying she doesn&#8217;t have a case to gripe about or has a perfect life. We all have problems. I&#8217;m saying you have to evaluate the <strong>sum total </strong>of circumstances. Is it patriarchy or did she just look bad? If she chooses not to have any plastic surgery or fillers or tweaks that&#8217;s her choice and we can applaud that. She&#8217;s going against the status quo and there are going to be some industry types who will push back. It&#8217;s part of the territory. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Complaining about how men get to age and be fat is a moot point. I&#8217;ve watched several tv shows and movies where the under 30 year-old male leads are buffed, manscaped and botoxed. I think there was a certain generation of established male stars who did get away with that. Not anymore! It&#8217;s not just women who must comply. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">For all of the claims of oppression, <strong>white women are running movie studios</strong> and they&#8217;re still considered the <strong>standard</strong> of beauty. <strong>Nepotism</strong> is rampant &#8211; or you can just refer to it as daddy, brother, cousin and family friend opening doors, especially amongst certain groups. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">I read a movie reviewer complain recently about how a young lead actress only got paid half a million to star in a huge mega blockbuster. There was not one non-white actress who even had a sliver of a chance getting cast. I have a funny feeling an actress of Viola Davis&#8217; caliber has barely been paid half a million for anything to date. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">This complete </span></span><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">whitewashing</span></span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> of the disparities the rest of the population of women face (to an extent) tells me how easily some choose to forget – if they ever noticed beyond paying lip-service. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Which is why I won&#8217;t go hunting for my </span></span><strong><em><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Mammy Cape</span></span></em></strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> trying to rescue </span></span><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">certain</span></span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> people for what are </span></span><em><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">individual</span></span></em><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> issues. This lesson has only been reinforced dozens of times since I began blogging. More AA women should ask how much will </span></span><span style="color: #000080;"><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Misogyny Hypocrisy</span></span></strong></span><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> cost them? </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">I need a </span></span><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">white woman victim tune-out</span></span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> because for one thing it&#8217;s grossly exaggerated and two it&#8217;s completely self-focused. You gotta hand it to them though because they </span></span><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong>stay on message and work together</strong></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">. Something black women need to learn from. I see why Asian women opted to bypass all of this publicly (name me two Asian political &#8216;feminists&#8217; who have an Executive Level/Spokesperson role at any of these feminist organizations) and instead MARRY the “oppressors”. It&#8217;s very smart. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Like I said during my post about <a href="http://actsoffaithblog.com/has-joanna-coles-marie-claire-declared-war-on-blacks-asians-latinas-marrying-white-men">Marie Claire</a>&#8216;s fake out, more of those women will continue beating the <strong>“White Males Are Defective”</strong> drum trying to poison the well. You see <strong>white women and black males</strong> using similar tactics in attempting to undermine their dominance.  Other women are <strong>not</strong> going to buy into that. There&#8217;s a HUGE difference between navigating boundaries and goals with a willing man and dealing with a DBR &#8211; or a combative, ethically challenged woman. Power grabs and <strong>emasculation techniques</strong> because some biological females don&#8217;t appreciate being women will continue to backfire for them. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">I <strong>am</strong> a woman and I&#8217;m tired of hearing about how <strong>bad</strong> they have it. They&#8217;re just driving the better-functioning men away and fueling the extremists. Remember rampant misogynist males were <strong>raised</strong> <strong>and influenced</strong> by women. Where&#8217;s the critical analysis of that?! We just need to state for the record that some women purporting <strong>their</strong> version of a “feminist” message do not speak for every similarly situated woman. </span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">See AOFB post: <a href="http://actsoffaithblog.com/abundance-is-where-women-who-don%e2%80%99t-want-to-wallow-in-powerlessness-go-to-create-a-better-life">abundance is where women who don&#8217;t want to wallow in powerlessness go to create a better life  </a></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://ifrymineinbutter.com/2010/04/26/the-kate-hudson-debacle-or-why-feminism-is-for-white-women-again/">The Kate Hudson Debacle, or Why Feminism is for White Women Again</a></span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://www.celebitchy.com/219894/ashley_judd_pens_wordy_essay_on_patriarchy_and_botox/">Ashley Judd pens wordy essay on patriarchy &amp; Botox, I think</a> </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">photo credit: AP<a href="http://ifrymineinbutter.com/2010/04/26/the-kate-hudson-debacle-or-why-feminism-is-for-white-women-again/"><br />
</a></span></span></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-4986"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Factsoffaithblog.com%2Fdoes-ashley-judd-think-shes-the-rosa-parks-of-patriarchy' data-shr_title='Does+Ashley+Judd+Think+She%27s+The+Rosa+Parks+Of+Patriarchy%3F'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://actsoffaithblog.com/does-ashley-judd-think-shes-the-rosa-parks-of-patriarchy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Think Margaret Atwood &amp; Octavia Butler Called It</title>
		<link>http://actsoffaithblog.com/i-think-margaret-atwood-octavia-butler-called-it</link>
		<comments>http://actsoffaithblog.com/i-think-margaret-atwood-octavia-butler-called-it#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Faith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dystopian Novels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margaret Atwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Octavia Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Handmaid's Tale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actsoffaithblog.com/?p=4746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="JUSTIFY">As we speed through another Women&#8217;s History Month I can&#8217;t help but wonder what unexpected events may occur. If you&#8217;ve been following some of the latest political shenanigans (and really you do need to pay attention) no one would blame you for expressing a myriad of emotions. It&#8217;s a three-ring circus with life-threatening consequences. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">As we speed through another <strong>Women&#8217;s History Month</strong> I can&#8217;t help but wonder what unexpected events may occur. If you&#8217;ve been following some of the latest political shenanigans (and really you do need to pay attention) no one would blame you for expressing a myriad of emotions. It&#8217;s a three-ring circus with life-threatening consequences. The way certain male politicians are trying to dictate an agenda that removes choice and erases women is only as foul as the women who support it. </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">There&#8217;s always a multi-tiered plan in play. By pushing for extremes, it erodes present boundaries. You have to wonder if life has a way of shifting huge imbalances though. Those politicians like Rick Santorum trying to deny women not only contraception, but pre-natal care fueled an emboldened Rush Limbaugh to go so far off the reservation we&#8217;re seeing real accountability for the first time. </span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;" align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span id="more-4746"></span>Writers have always observed and explained human behavior in creative ways. With our way of life being in such a massive flux right now dystopian stories seem to accurately depict societal turmoil. Margaret Atwood&#8217;s The Handmaid&#8217;s Tale.</span></span><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #000000;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> From Wikipedia:</span></span></p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;" align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #333399;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The Handmaid&#8217;s Tale is set in the near future in the Republic of Gilead, a country formed within the borders of what was formerly the United States of America. It was founded by a racist, male chauvinist, nativist, theocratic-organized military coup as an ideologically driven response to the pervasive ecological, physical and social degradation of the country.</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #333399;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Beginning with a staged terrorist attack (blamed on Islamic extremist terrorists) that kills the President and most of Congress, a movement calling itself the &#8220;Sons of Jacob&#8221; launched a revolution and suspended the United States Constitution under the pretext of restoring order.</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #333399;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Taking advantage of electronic banking, they were quickly able to freeze the assets of all women and other &#8220;undesirables&#8221; in the country, stripping them of their rights. </span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #333399;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The new theocratic military dictatorship, styled &#8220;The Republic of Gilead&#8221;, moved quickly to consolidate its power and reorganize society along a new militarized, hierarchical, compulsorily Christian regime of Old Testament-inspired social and religious orthodoxy among its newly created social classes. In this society, almost all women are forbidden to read.<br />
</span></span></p>
</blockquote>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Kindred is considered one of literary greats and we could easily use other novels by Octavia Butler. From Amazon:</span></span></p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;" align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #333399;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Dana, a modern black woman, is celebrating her twenty-sixth birthday with her new husband when she is snatched abruptly from her home in California and transported to the antebellum South. Rufus, the white son of a plantation owner, is drowning, and Dana has been summoned to save him. Dana is drawn back repeatedly through time to the slave quarters, and each time the stay grows longer, more arduous, and more dangerous until it is uncertain whether or not Dana&#8217;s life will end, long before it has a chance to begin. </span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; color: #333399;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Many times throughout history sheer terror has been used to subdue a population and sap it of its strength. One only has to look at the Tsar&#8217;s of Russia like Ivan the Terrible, Peter the Great, and Stalin to realize the extent to which terror can be used to subjugate a people. The Southern aristocracy of the United States practiced a similar terror until 1864 and beyond. </span></span></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;" align="LEFT"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">If you&#8217;re unfamiliar with both works now would be a good time to acclimate. Both stories reflect adversity and challenges, but each heroine still makes a decision to survive her circumstances and we&#8217;re left with hope for a brighter future. Hollywood is way off-base for not making a movie franchise from Butler&#8217;s novels by the way.  Let&#8217;s take that message and run with it in real life.</span></span></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-4746"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Factsoffaithblog.com%2Fi-think-margaret-atwood-octavia-butler-called-it' data-shr_title='I+Think+Margaret+Atwood+%26+Octavia+Butler+Called+It'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://actsoffaithblog.com/i-think-margaret-atwood-octavia-butler-called-it/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rapper Too Short Makes &#8216;Rape&#8217; Training Video, Liz Trotta Shoulder Shrugs, But We&#8217;ll Let CBS &amp; The Grammys Have the Last Word Regarding Chris Brown</title>
		<link>http://actsoffaithblog.com/rapper-too-short-makes-rape-training-video-but-well-let-cbs-the-grammys-have-the-last-word-regarding-chris-brown</link>
		<comments>http://actsoffaithblog.com/rapper-too-short-makes-rape-training-video-but-well-let-cbs-the-grammys-have-the-last-word-regarding-chris-brown#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Faith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rap Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actsoffaithblog.com/?p=4615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">I admit I&#8217;m a little overloaded &#8211; and heated from seeing so many of Whitney Houston&#8217;s &#8220;friends&#8221; deflect, deny and blame others while being rather dismissive of their own ignorance and complicity. Kelly Price claiming Houston was &#8220;sober&#8221; from using certain illegal drugs (ignoring the Rx ones) but that she&#8217;d only been a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><em>I admit I&#8217;m a little overloaded &#8211; and heated from seeing so many of Whitney Houston&#8217;s &#8220;friends&#8221; deflect, deny and blame others while being rather dismissive of their own ignorance and complicity. Kelly Price claiming Houston was &#8220;sober&#8221; from using certain illegal drugs (ignoring the Rx ones) but that she&#8217;d only been a little tipsy from drinking champagne. Chaka Khan blasting Clive Davis for not cancelling his annual pre-Grammy party but saying her fondest memory of Whitney was them getting high with Bobby Brown in Miami. Jennifer Holliday telling the world Whitney experimented with drugs before meeting Bobby Brown. It was 80&#8242;s. Drugs were passed around like party favors back then. There&#8217;s a huge leap from occasional use to addict. Some people are so happy to get in front of a national audience they forget it isn&#8217;t about them! The toxic influence of those closest to Houston was certainly indicative of where her life would go. </em></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><em>Now onto the matter at hand. More anti-woman tomfoolery!!</em></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span id="more-4615"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/2012/02/14/grammys-beat-the-super-bowl/"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Grammys Beat The Super Bowl</span></span></a></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Bob Lefsetz reviews the show. Here&#8217;s my recap: It SUCKED!! </span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Between Nicki Minaj having an exorcism, bands named The Civil Wars and Lady Antebellum &#8211; just call yourselves <em>Slavery Nostalgia</em> and call it a day &#8211; and the <strong>mediocre songs with even more snooze-worthy performances</strong> <strong>the only thing that made it interesting was we could share our pain on Twitter</strong>. Adele was good but she doesn&#8217;t sound the same post-surgery. If she&#8217;s already having problems with her voice at 23 that doesn&#8217;t bode well. Bruno Mars channeled Jackie Wilson and James Brown (I know). That might impress the younger set, but for those who are familiar with the work of the originators, derivative performances and appropriation of African-American cultural contributions is annoying. <em>But whose fault is that?</em> I felt we were misled in a way expecting a rousing tribute to Houston, and it was too soon. Jennifer Hudson was excellent though.<br />
</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Here&#8217;s where the criticism gets interesting. We know Chris Brown not only attended, but performed twice! Ken Ehrlich produced the Grammys. There were also enough <strong>white women</strong> who expressed their desire to be <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/horrible-reactions-to-chris-brown-at-the-grammys">beat up by him on Twitter</a> that someone&#8217;s going to <a href="http://news.change.org/stories/tell-the-grammys-no-you-were-not-the-victim-of-chris-browns-domestic-violence?utm_source=social_media&amp;utm_medium=facebook_cause&amp;utm_content=petition&amp;utm_campaign=en_usa_wr">step in to police this</a>. The bottom line though is that <strong>we often act against our better nature</strong>. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> The public backlash has obviously touched a nerve.  </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Lefsetz&#8217;s criticism ended with &#8211; </span></span></p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The Grammys may have forgiven Chris Brown, but not the public, most of the comments on social media were negative! Meanwhile, he appeared on the telecast twice. Shows that Ken Ehrlich and CBS are out of touch.<br />
</span></span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">To which Erlich replied (I edited the profanity) &#8211; </span></span></p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">i don&#8217;t know who you are, or what you have against me, but if you think i&#8217;m out of touch, putting on a show that features dance music with david guetta and deadmau5, performances by every major contemporary act, and trying together the generations, then what the f**k do you call yourself?</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">it&#8217;s because of people like you that the music business is in the trouble it is now, you dinosaur.</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">stop trying to appear to be relevant. it&#8217;s not working.</span></span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Ehrlich certainly <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/entertainment/2012/02/grammy-exec-producer-says-its-time-chris-brown-returned/">went out of his way to praise</a> Chris Brown. </span></span></p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">I think people deserve a second chance, you know. If you’ll note, he has not been on the Grammys for the past few years and it may have taken us a while to kind of get over the fact that we were the victim of what happened.</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">What he’s done and what he’s done to reclaim his career and seemingly the kind of person that he has become makes him — I don’t even want to use the word eligible  — but you know, it’s time. </span></span></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong>What exactly has Brown done of note</strong>? Black people sing and dance every day! He sent an <a href="http://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/66572483.html?page=4">F*** you message of his own</a> to his critics despite winning a Grammy. Who voted for him in the first place? The continued support of an unrepentant&#8230;I don&#8217;t even know what to call him&#8230;is a reflection of the blatant misogyny in our society. We can&#8217;t let it stand unchallenged.<br />
</span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">I was reading a post at <a href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2012/02/13/the-shit-list/">Feministe</a> where someone mentioned the irony in the lack of support for Janet Jackson. I will call out Feministe and the whole lot of them for their BS and racio-misogyny when they&#8217;re silent about black woman denigration but THIS was on the money. The buck stops with NARAS President Neil Portnow and Les Moonves, CEO of CBS. What&#8217;s galling is how CBS and the Grammys BANNED Janet Jackson a few years ago after the Super Bowl wardrobe malfunction. She hasn&#8217;t attended or performed on the show since. I have no idea whether <em>Breastgate</em> was an accident or intentional, but there were TWO people involved. Justin Timber<em>snake</em> was never banned. Somehow Jackson was <strong>solely responsible</strong> and expected to take the hit. Why are black women simultaneously villified and dismissed? Inside and outside the dead black community, by each other and others.</span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><em><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">But we&#8217;re not done. </span></span></em></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><a>http://actsoffaithblog.com/beat-her-down-brown-part-one-when-victims-are-complicit-in-their-abuse</a></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://actsoffaithblog.com/%E2%80%9Cbeat-her-down%E2%80%9D-brown-part-2-support-those-that-support-you-or-else">http://actsoffaithblog.com/%E2%80%9Cbeat-her-down%E2%80%9D-brown-part-2-support-those-that-support-you-or-else</a><br />
</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Onto more &#8220;fun&#8221; -  (c)Rapper Too Short decided he has the skills to <a href="http://www.thegrio.com/entertainment/too-short-gives-boys-advice-to-turn-girls-out-xxl.php">guide young black males</a> in the ways of &#8220;wooing&#8221; (mostly black) women. This is someone who produces extremely graphic <del>disgusting</del> hard-core rap AND <strong>he&#8217;s been arrested for assault</strong>! He should never be given a platform to spread this dangerous message again!<br />
</span></span></p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8220;When you get to late middle school, early high school and you start feeling a certain way about the girls&#8230; I&#8217;m gonna tell you a couple tricks,&#8221; Too Short said in the video. &#8220;A lot of the boys are going to be running around trying to get kisses from the girls&#8230;We&#8217;re going way past that. I&#8217;m taking you to the hole.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">He gives graphic detail about overpowering a girl and physical actions that describe rape on a video that was posted during an interview on XXL, managed by <strong>Editor-In-Chief Vanessa</strong> Satten. You can contact her on <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/vanessa-satten/b/490/92">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/vsattenxxl">Twitter</a> and <a href="http://www.facebook.com/vsatten">Facebook</a>. The video has been pulled while she feigns ignorance of how it was approved in the first place. Yeah right. It&#8217;s just some <em>unsuspecting black girl</em> after all. Too Short has described this as a <em>misunderstanding</em>. Sounds like Jerry Sandusky <em>not understanding</em> our collective outrage over his alleged abuse.  </span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Since we already know the majority of black boys and girls are abandoned and inadequately parented, the psychology of media that hypersexualizes them coupled with the community decay is a breeding ground for Rwanda. If you&#8217;ve been reading this and other forums you&#8217;ve seen the trends. Since these types of violent black males are moving on en masse after <em>practicing</em> on black girls and more white girls think they&#8217;re missing out on all the &#8220;fun&#8221;, when <strong>certain non-black men decide to check each other (John Mayer, Letterman) and black males (Roland Martin as of late) more forcibly</strong>, the <a href="http://sojournerspassport.com/last-call-to-evacuate-black-residential-areas-before-the-peace-walls-go-up/">protective walls</a> will come up swiftly!  </span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><em>But we&#8217;re not done</em>. Let&#8217;s close this conversation with the philosophies of Fox News hack Liz Trotta for the anti-woman trifecta! While I agree men and women aren&#8217;t the same, I&#8217;m not a (political) feminist and I can smell her BS a mile away. In arguing against women military officers serving more directly in front-line combat, she suggests being raped is a forgone conclusion.<br />
<object width="325" height="288" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="flashvars" value="config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?f=/static/clips/2012/02/12/22888/fnc-anhq-20120212-womenmilitary.flv" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allownetworking" value="all" /><param name="src" value="http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/pl55.swf" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed width="325" height="288" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/pl55.swf" wmode="transparent" flashvars="config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?f=/static/clips/2012/02/12/22888/fnc-anhq-20120212-womenmilitary.flv" allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" allowfullscreen="true" /><img src="http://actsoffaithblog.com/wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/advanced/img/trans.gif" class="mceItemMedia mceItemFlash" width="325" height="288" data-mce-json="{'video':{},'params':{'src':'http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/pl55.swf','wmode':'transparent','flashvars':'config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?f=/static/clips/2012/02/12/22888/fnc-anhq-20120212-womenmilitary.flv','allowscriptaccess':'always','allownetworking':'all','allowfullscreen':'true'}}" alt="" /></object></span></span></p>
<p align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Millions of women have fought in wars and defended their tribes in the history of humankind. They&#8217;ve served as medical staff, operated as spies, scouted and always worked under dangerous conditions. That should not deter anyone. We determine our fates and the way we value or devalue each other matters. Where do you stand?<br />
</span></span></p>
<p><object width="325" height="288" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:408330" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="base" value="." /><param name="flashvars" value="" /><embed width="325" height="288" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:408330" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" base="." flashvars="" /></object></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-4615"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Factsoffaithblog.com%2Frapper-too-short-makes-rape-training-video-but-well-let-cbs-the-grammys-have-the-last-word-regarding-chris-brown' data-shr_title='Rapper+Too+Short+Makes+%27Rape%27+Training+Video%2C+Liz+Trotta+Shoulder+Shrugs%2C+But+We%27ll+Let+CBS+%26+The+Grammys+Have+the+Last+Word+Regarding+Chris+Brown+'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://actsoffaithblog.com/rapper-too-short-makes-rape-training-video-but-well-let-cbs-the-grammys-have-the-last-word-regarding-chris-brown/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Were Obama, Andrew Breitbart &amp; Ben Jealous So Quick To Demonize Shirley Sherrod?</title>
		<link>http://actsoffaithblog.com/why-were-obama-andrew-breitbart-ben-jealous-so-quick-to-demonize-shirley-sherrod</link>
		<comments>http://actsoffaithblog.com/why-were-obama-andrew-breitbart-ben-jealous-so-quick-to-demonize-shirley-sherrod#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Faith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betrayal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foolishness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shirley sherrod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actsoffaithblog.com/?p=1480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Who wants to be integrated into a burning house? &#8211; MLK</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">Where&#8217;s Newt Gingrich when you need him? He was offering his assistance and support to the NAACP last week in their stupid misguided attempt at promoting faux controversies and blatant fundraising schemes fighting racism by denouncing the Tea Party. Not to help [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><em>Who wants to be integrated into a burning house? &#8211; MLK</em></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Where&#8217;s Newt Gingrich when you need him? He was offering his assistance and support to the NAACP last week in their <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">stupid </span>misguided attempt at <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">promoting faux <em>controversies</em> and blatant fundraising schemes</span> fighting racism by denouncing the Tea Party. Not to help black people of course but to divide and conquer.  <em>I bet you Ben Jealous would sure love a distraction story right now.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This is the same Newt Gingrich who led a very successful Republican obstructionist/attack  agenda when he served as Speaker Of The House during the Clinton Administration amongst other things. Thanks to Billy Jeff&#8217;s proclivities, their failed attempt at impeachment and constant pressure he signed the very flawed <strong><a href="http://www.fcc.gov/telecom.html"><span style="color: #333399;">Telecommunications Act of 1996</span></a></strong> into law. I&#8217;m reminding you dear readers of this most recent history because it ties into this latest debacle from the last 24-hours.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span id="more-1480"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">We all know how redundant the <strong>FCC</strong> is especially if you use online media, have a cell phone, watch cable, listen to the radio, require internet access and have seen prices skyrocket while the quality of programming has sunk to the depths of mediocrity. That&#8217;s due to the deregulation that allowed for a <strong>concentration of media ownership by one company</strong>. Some would simply call it <strong><em>monopoly</em></strong>, but it&#8217;s not nearly as fun to play as the board game.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">We&#8217;ve seen what havoc banking deregulation (initiated by Republicans, co-signed by the co-opted and spineless Democrats)  has brought down on this country (and the world). Our economy has yet to recover and will never go back to the way we once knew things. Due to the constant deregulation pushed by the Republican agenda conglomerates have taken over, independent media has been almost completely marginalized and terrestrial radio is craptastic.  In case this doesn&#8217;t connect with you, 1996 was also the year Fox went on the air. Oh happy joy!</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">What the FCC hasn&#8217;t bungled, the FTC will gut and kill off given the chance since they&#8217;ll be targeting those of us who write content in online forums and use social networking. So rabble rouse while you can before they roll up on us gangbanger-style.  </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This ties into the lack of enforcable standards of so-called traditional journalism along with television standards and practices &#8211; of which there doesn&#8217;t seem to be much left.  Andrew Breitbart took it upon himself to enlighten us with a doctored version of a speech given in March by former USDA Director of Rural Development for Georgia Shirley Sherrod.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In this speech Sherrod discussed her own personal history at separating unfavorable racial attitudes and unpleasant life experiences in light of meeting the needs of people. Just a quick background, Sherrod is 62 so she would remember the Jim Crow era and life before Civil Rights. Also her father was murdered by a white male KKK member when she was 17. She went on to tell how she had to set aside the previous negativity when she oversaw a case involving a white farmer who needed assistance.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>She was not an employee of the USDA at the time. This also occurred in the 1980&#8242;s.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Breitbart made it seem as if this was something that happened recently while in her current role instead of a Reagan-era event. Remember <strong>Ronald Reagan, the denier of AIDS and race-baiter</strong>? Fox News and quite a few others who lack real journalistic standards jumped all over this story.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">So let&#8217;s connect the dots: Gingrich  &#8211;&gt; Breitbart &#8211;&gt; Media That Spins A Negative False Story  &#8211;&gt; Race  Distortion vs. REAL Racism&#8211;&gt;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Now how does the NAACP jump in the mix? Well&#8230;.I think they were so busy being <em>outraged</em> they didn&#8217;t bother to do any DUE DILIGENCE. They publicly condemned Sherrod for&#8230;wait for it&#8230;RACISM! <strong>Of course the NAACP knows all about racism&#8230;against black women for ignoring the needs of their most loyal constituents.</strong> Let&#8217;s never forget how the West Palm Beach chapter joined with Rev Hot Comb Al Sharpton in defending the now-convicted Dunbar Village rapists.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Trail of Shame for the Shameless: Gingrich &#8212;&gt; Breitbart &#8212;&gt; YELLOW JOURNALISM &#8212;&gt;NAACP &#8212;&gt; SEXISM and&#8230;the Obama Administration.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">How? Well they also denounced Sherrod and she was coerced into resigning. She was harrassed while she was driving for goodness sake! Didn&#8217;t any of these people take Oprah&#8217;s <strong>No Phone Zone</strong> pledge?</p>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<blockquote><p>Sherrod said she received a phone call from the <a title="U.S. Department of Agriculture" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/U.S.+Department+of+Agriculture">USDA</a>&#8216;s deputy undersecretary <a title="Cheryl Cook" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/Cheryl+Cook">Cheryl Cook</a>  on Monday while she was in a car. Cook told her that the White House wanted her to call it quits.</p>
<p>&#8220;They called me twice,&#8221; Sherrod told the <a title="The Associated Press" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/The+Associated+Press">Associated Press</a>. &#8220;The last time they asked me to pull over the side of the road and submit my resignation on my Blackberry, and that&#8217;s what I did.&#8221;  NY Daily News</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Apparently they were <em>scurred</em> of Glen Beck doing a story on Sherrod but curiously enough he refused. Since Beck hasn&#8217;t let something like facts get in his way of spreading chaos and mayhem perhaps someone should&#8217;ve paid close attention. Sherrod should have told them to shove it and hired a lawyer immediately but she&#8217;s probably a loyalist who takes orders without question.  If the Obama Administration was not hell-bent on distancing itself from the needs of blacks and stopped being overly concerned with the right wingers (i.e white people mad he&#8217;s in office) then perhaps Obama would take a stance for something for a change.  It&#8217;s a combination of obvious fear on the part of this President for standing up to the obstructionists and the lack of control over his message that makes him appear far too eager to meet with the approval of those who will always seek his failure.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Some people won&#8217;t even allow for such concessions and see a trend where blacks will be literally ignored into oblivion. It&#8217;s certainly time other black people reassess their near-blind support for Obama and start exacting some standards PUBLICLY. A reality check is in order for the condition of the entire collective. After all, <strong>black women were the largest percentage of voters for Obama</strong> to begin with. The backpedalling (or CYA) from the White House has already begun as it&#8217;s floated by USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack it was his decision to fire Sherrod without input from the White House. <em>Yeah right.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The NAACP misleadership should be ashamed of themselves for jumping the gun and attacking a woman who could be the grandmother next door. <strong>Her speech was taken out of context and no one bothered to check!</strong>  Ben Jealous was on tv last night making a fool himself apparently but by then I was tired of watching this media circus. He and Obama are at least a generation removed from those who fought for Civil Rights. Nor is Obama African-American. They&#8217;ve certainly enjoyed the benefits of the sacrifices of women like Shirley Sherrod. Breibart is a less-clever copycat of yellow journalists but his throw rocks and duck tactic is effective yet predictable.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>It&#8217;s time we take a stand for justice. </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>1. Ben Jealous needs to be fired</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>2. President Obama needs to apologize to Sherrod &#8211; and us for his failure in leadership</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>3. Shirley Sherrod needs to have her job reinstated OR whatever else she wants (including winning a defamation lawsuit against Breitbart and the NAACP)</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>4. We need journalistic standards and integrity put on the front burner and an overhaul of the monkey-see monkey-do crew</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Perhaps Sherrod can embark on a career discussing race and sexism in a society where white and (half) black men all join together to piss all over who they view to be defenseless : <em>a black woman</em>. Or take a nice looong vacation. It&#8217;s shoould be HER choice and I hope she doesn&#8217;t let them off the hook without recompense. Thank goodness an inter-racial and inter-generational group of people  have pushed back against her being permanently <em>blacklisted</em>. I&#8217;m also relieved to see black people distinguish the difference between a true injustice versus excusing criminals.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Andrew Breitbart is just flexing his muscles as he makes his play as a more telegenic Rush Limbaugh. He&#8217;s as greasy and slimy as that BP Oil Spill and even more toxic. No matter, he&#8217;s tipped his hand. Lucifer wants us to know he has better things to occupy his time with than messing with 62 year old grandmothers &#8211; but Breitbart&#8217;s just shot up on the list for the Hell Hounds to greet in the pit.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Ben Jealous says he&#8217;s &#8220;sorry&#8221; and he&#8217;ll talk to Sherrod when he&#8217;s back in GA. Does she even want to meet with Jealous? Sounds like it&#8217;s on his &#8220;high-priority&#8221; list between swimming in warm tea, television appearances and fighting white hegemony for profit.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Obama will continue to kowtow (let&#8217;s keep it real) but at least it&#8217;ll be far more obvious to those that ought to be paying attention. This is a teachable moment so pay attention: <strong>black males will continue to jockey for power in a partriarchy-based hegemony war</strong>  <strong>with white males at our expense even at that level.</strong> <strong>They need to know black women will not continue to be used as canon fodder</strong>. </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>The rush to frame racism, misuse charges of racism and denial of racism by males in power will ALWAYS fail when they refuse to account for their SEXISM.</strong> Obama wasted his race &#8220;grace period&#8221; when he foolishly stuck up for Skippy &#8220;I&#8217;m more European than African&#8221; Gates last summer. Remember the &#8220;Beer Summit&#8221; where the white cop said he would not aplogize and didn&#8217;t? Shirley Sherrod deserves so much more! If this is how the administration is going to treat blacks (particularly black women) in America it&#8217;s going to be a rotten six years (provided he&#8217;s reelected).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Here&#8217;s something else for all the black women who continue to support the do-little organizations from the Industrial Complex and/or blowhard politicians and pundits to consider:</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>After you&#8217;ve devoted all of your free time building them up and your financial resources at sustaining them what have they done for you lately? They&#8217;ve moved from ignoring the needs of black women (supporting black male criminals and miscreants)  to openly attacking you. Do you still plan on supporting them after this? Or will you claim it was anomoly? Don&#8217;t be caught with no safety net or backup support when they&#8217;re done leeching from you.</strong></p>
<p>This is the video in its entirety. If you fast forward to 16:00 you&#8217;ll get to the best parts.<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="300" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/E9NcCa_KjXk&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999&amp;border=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="300" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/E9NcCa_KjXk&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999&amp;border=1" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
<p>EAVB_GIGBHCCXLZ</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-1480"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Factsoffaithblog.com%2Fwhy-were-obama-andrew-breitbart-ben-jealous-so-quick-to-demonize-shirley-sherrod' data-shr_title='Why+Were+Obama%2C+Andrew+Breitbart+%26+Ben+Jealous+So+Quick+To+Demonize+Shirley+Sherrod%3F'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://actsoffaithblog.com/why-were-obama-andrew-breitbart-ben-jealous-so-quick-to-demonize-shirley-sherrod/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyonce Bounces &amp; Jiggles For A National Audience And That&#8217;s A Good Thing?</title>
		<link>http://actsoffaithblog.com/beyonce-bounces-jiggles-for-a-national-audience-and-thats-a-good-thing</link>
		<comments>http://actsoffaithblog.com/beyonce-bounces-jiggles-for-a-national-audience-and-thats-a-good-thing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Faith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lambert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyonce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Male Privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Transformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saartjie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actsoffaithblog.com/?p=944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">I heard about but didn&#8217;t watch the Beyonce television special that aired Thursday evening.  I find her music utterly boring and know that no matter how popular she is today (in part due to hard work and her appearance) it will not endure decades from now. Plus her videos offend me. Cheap titillation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p style="text-align: justify;">I heard about but didn&#8217;t watch the Beyonce television special that aired Thursday evening.  I find her music utterly boring and know that no matter how popular she is today (in part due to hard work and her appearance) it will not endure decades from now. Plus her videos offend me. Cheap titillation for the masses works for the masses not for individual enlightenment. It really irritates me to hear people bestow icon status to someone who was at the right place at the right time (after Aaliyah&#8217;s death) and positioned accordingly.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">So I really hate to admonish some of you but you leave me no choice. I&#8217;m all for being free, proud of your body, footloose and fancy free but come on! Yup, it&#8217;s time to break out my ruler and rap some knuckles. Honestly many of you should know better. In fact many of you DO know better but no matter. You like what you like. Despite all progressive agenda fighting and declarations of outrage over inequality you simply like to see a <strong>black woman shaking her a**</strong>. Oh and other women of color too &#8211; but hands down it&#8217;s black women for the win <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">loss</span>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span id="more-944"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Of course in <strong>Bouncy&#8217;s</strong> case I may need to qualify her &#8220;blackness&#8221;. One day it&#8217;s light-skinned, the next it&#8217;s Creole and it&#8217;s even Latina <a href="http://www.beyonce-k.com/did-beyonce-really-say-this/">according to her interview</a> with the magazine. Now other cultures are wonderful. We can learn much from each other. Some of us even have a shared experience of past capture, forced labor and similar DNA. It&#8217;s just funny though because I don&#8217;t recall the last time I&#8217;ve ever read a national (cultural) magazine where the subject waxed philosophically about how they wished they were a different ethnicity.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Leave it to black people for that one because how many enjoy pointing out how they&#8217;re x, y, z and a in an effort to make it clear they&#8217;re a different kind of <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">white</span> brown meat? Not that acknowledging one&#8217;s heritage is a bad thing but think about how many blacks (and I&#8217;m pointing the finger squarely at African-Americans) have claimed to have &#8220;Indian blood&#8221; in them all the while the <em>real</em> American Indians are pulling tribal rolls and forcibly revoking status of those with majority African DNA &#8211; but not those with European DNA. Even brown-skinned Latinos with similar African DNA who may <em>look</em> black tend to make it clear they are NOT black. Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I also find it disappointing but not surprising how many cis gay men love to keep women in their place. That place being a body appropriated for male objectification. In the case of black women it is often added with the continued role reversal of women taking on responsibilities of black men as a collective due to their mass abandonment/defection. We have a more recent example with Adam Lambert. Boy did I champion him hard during last season&#8217;s American Idol. I knew he was going to be somewhat marginalized due to his orientation and being the justice seeker I am, I wrote about it. So imagine my rage when I saw the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/20/adam-lambert-goes-hetero_n_327262.html">spread in Details magazine</a>. Yes, <em><strong>spread</strong></em> is a totally applicable word for that photo shoot was all soft-core porn and anger. Sex and violence directed at women is what we&#8217;re supposed to fighting against, not celebrating as &#8220;edgy&#8221;, &#8220;artistic&#8221; or any other BS excuse he and his team would choose to come up with. It&#8217;s why I wait to see how those who claim to be liberal and progressive behave in scenarios that don&#8217;t directly affect them to see if that fairness they seek is extended to others.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">So yet another male basks in his privilege to dominate a woman even when he isn&#8217;t interested in them. I care not one whit about the flack Lambert&#8217;s received over his &#8220;dark and edgy&#8221; but <em>musically</em> <em>boring</em> performance during the AMAs either. There is no difference between that message of bared flesh for male consumption in Details and the one produced in hip-hop music and videos. It&#8217;s trite and T-I-R-E-D. Even when women try to be edgy that way it falls flat because it lacks sincerity. Gimmicks are for card tricks, Vegas and magicians, not recording artists who want to have enduring careers. Alas, there&#8217;s the rub. Quality versus the glut of crap-tastic &#8220;artists&#8221; being force-fed to an ever-quickly tuned-out audience. Yes, as always there are exceptions but puh-leeze one drop in a bucket of piss doesn&#8217;t make a lick of difference.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Bringing this back to the subject at hand &#8211; <strong>Bouncy</strong> &#8211; can do whatever she wishes in her career by the way. It&#8217;s her choice. Yet I loathe to hear people fawn over her skills as a &#8220;performer&#8221; while ignoring the big giant pink elephant in the room. She&#8217;s working the room better than the $500/night <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">stripper</span> exotic dancer at the local &#8220;gentleman&#8217;s club&#8221; and there&#8217;s <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">no</span> little difference between what both women are doing to earn a living. Of course she&#8217;s not the only one, Shakira being another who abandoned her roots music for an English language audience and hip shaking. Why? She&#8217;s an amazing songwriter who does actually write them and isn&#8217;t simply jacking credits. There are others as well like Miley Cyrus who danced on a pole at an awards show  - geared for children. I can&#8217;t not mention Britney Spears either. The porn-i-fi-ca-tion that&#8217;s taken over and where it&#8217;s being made to seem normal <strong>is</strong> a huge problem.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It is black women though who are in the most vulnerable position across the board as a collective. We can&#8217;t afford to do what other women do. They are protected. We are not. Our image is being assaulted by a host of trough-eaters looking to cash in on presenting our insecurities as pathologies that we can&#8217;t overcome. Which many <strong>still</strong> don&#8217;t get. It&#8217;s no coincidence this effort is attached to black (and mostly male) faces just as our collective image was prominently elevated by the First Lady of African-American decent.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Janet Jackson&#8217;s career has <strong><em>still</em></strong> <strong><em>not recovered </em></strong>from the debacle following the Super Bowl performance. As long as it&#8217;s acceptable within the &#8220;black&#8221; community for artists like Beyonce to put themselves out there they will continue to do so. It has not gone unnoticed how the number of &#8220;black&#8221; female artists are now almost exclusively bi-racial and multi-cultural unless they&#8217;re white women (i.e. Fergie) who have a developed &#8220;black&#8221; sound. The booty-shaking will even be labeled  &#8221;empowerment&#8221; but there&#8217;s nothing empowering about reinforcing <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saartjie_Baartman">Saartjie</a> stereotypes. Even Madonna &#8211; who has thrived on provocation (and cultural appropriation) didn&#8217;t cross certain lines. Once you&#8217;ve put yourself out there you can&#8217;t control how others react and I know many would be upset if non-black &#8211; ok &#8211; white men started talking about how much they like to see Beyonce &#8220;performing&#8221;. So if that&#8217;s the case then why be okay with it NOW?</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-944"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Factsoffaithblog.com%2Fbeyonce-bounces-jiggles-for-a-national-audience-and-thats-a-good-thing' data-shr_title='Beyonce+Bounces+%26+Jiggles+For+A+National+Audience+And+That%27s+A+Good+Thing%3F'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://actsoffaithblog.com/beyonce-bounces-jiggles-for-a-national-audience-and-thats-a-good-thing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 18/23 queries in 0.040 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: actsoffaithblog.com @ 2012-05-23 23:40:57 -->
