I’m Not Sure If Empowerment Is the Real Goal For Some Black Bloggers

So if you read a variety of blogs like I do you may start to notice certain trends. Some of the same readers of one blog may also read another with varying levels of interest. Sometimes blog hosts may link to each other or mention something they’ve read or commented on. Often some will read but not quite comprehend and misinterpret the position of a blogger. I think we have to remember that bottom line we are all human and make mistakes.

Some may use their forum to uplift, challenge or reinforce existing commonalities. Some may inadvertently tear people down while claiming to do the opposite. Some seem to enjoy reveling in the dysfunction of others. Some may have perspectives that are completely different from what would be expected. All of these things can be useful for us if we are interested in renewing our mindsets or are otherwise open to being engaged.

Now I myself have found it necessary to be firm in my positions even as I seek to challenge myself to be a better person. Bottom line though is that I generally like Black people though I may question the motives of some and their impact on the general public. I have never wanted to not be Black, though as an African-American woman living in the US I have often wanted a less arduous journey. I know some of the challenges have been raced-based, but there has also been gender bias at play as well. Class mobility comes into play as well.

I’ve had quite a few moments of clarity reading the works of some Black female bloggers this past year. I’ve had things articulated in such a way that a few online conversations have resolved some things that I could never work through to my satisfaction in therapy. Which I recommend as it can have the same positive benefits of going to the gym to work on your body. Sometimes it takes another person who’s had a similar experience to fully understand where you’re coming from. Other times we need a completely different perspective to gain new ground.

This is where I find myself at a quandary. Some have been dubbed “empowerment” bloggers because they want to elevate the level of discourse. Or have others evaluate their choices. In theory this is great. Some people have a lot of wisdom to share and reintroducing common sense shouldn’t seem like a foreign concept! Others seem to offer bold and brash ways of thinking by getting us to ponder several objectives. I’m just not sure if they all really like the others they claim to want to be participating with. It has to be about principles not individuals, right?

I say this because while we are certainly not a monolith, or share the same backgrounds we do have some commonality somewhere down the line. We also have differences that need to acknowledged. Why is it threatening to discuss the intra-ethnic differences amongst Blacks but still want African-Americans to be given their proper respect? Some blog hosts say a lot of things that have me scratching my head at times because I feel as if I’m getting my hand slapped versus a pat on the back of encouragement. If we’re supposed to be coming together to hash out strategies and reevaluate how we think why do I feel the tone is off – harsh or even full of admonishment? Why do I feel condescended to at times?

Sometimes people assume and attribute things that were never explicitly said, sometimes I think people are responding to dog whistle disdain. If we can talk about class envy then we should also talk about class prejudice. If historically the Black elite did things to set themselves apart from other Blacks to further elevate their status how would that be any different today from the way those few that have access to and have owned media show how little regard they have by their content? Look at what Essence magazine (dubbed “Messence” by another blogger) is doing by suggesting going to a strip club to meet a Black man.

Why can’t we discuss opening up our social circles and world outlook to include many people from diverse backgrounds but still remember who we are? This can’t be about running away, for wherever we go there we are. We can’t look externally or through consuming goods to feel good about ourselves. Yes, we are responsible for our own self-esteem but it gets to be a little bit more challenging when a) white women are still being held as the standard of womanhood b) So many Black people are self-hating c) They have access to the media to promote their self-hate and hate of BW. We’re working with certain unmovable factors, but others are entirely our own design!

So I think it’s a valid argument that we should look at those individuals who’ve been elevated to “desirable” status and question why. That some of those happen to be multi-ethnic/have certain features is not an accident. When they claim the full spectrum of their heritage it’s a great thing, but can we not also acknowledge that some are also diminishing certain parts of their heritage for others and the one that they seek to lessen is their Blackness? If we’re going to discuss the internal motivations of some who need to step it up then we must also recognize the barriers others would like to see in place.

When do we ever hear of a bi-racial/multi ethnic POC with white ancestry deny or try to diminish it the way they do their Blackness? There may be confusion about race versus ethnicity not because of a lack of understanding it but because so many are trying to deny certain parts of who they are. I don’t think every brown-skinned person is Black (or African-American) but I know we all share a common African ancestry via DNA. That also applies to white-skinned people. If Italians were touted over Germans and Poles were stopped for walking down the street and followed through stores it would change the order of how whiteness has been established in this country. If an Estonian and Dutch person married and produced children and that child wanted to acknowledge its combined Du-Esto heritage fine, but if the Dutch side was featured more and thought of as more favorable wouldn’t the Estonians have a right to give pause to it? If all the white people from each ethnic group said “Hey we’re all white why do we need to discuss intra-ethnic matters” wouldn’t that seem strange?

I also have concerns about certain discussions being framed using the term “all-Black construct”. Certain mindsets are being discussed as the source of those that come from one versus its opposite as one is better than the other. Are we talking about geographical location and residential neighborhood or a state of mind? There needs to be a distinction. We need to continue discussing how culturally adrift many Blacks feel today and why researching one’s lineage is so important. We need as many pieces of the puzzle we can put together so people stop clinging to false tokens and throwing away what heritage we do have left. Yes, we need to recognize the unique talents and contributions of those descended from the mostly enslaved populations from the US and how other Blacks get to benefit from those historic struggles. That doesn’t diminish any individual any more than someone who wishes to acknowledge their full spectrum non-Black heritage.

I don’t like criminality, I don’t like apathy, I don’t like mediocrity. Having standards is necessary but I know that I tend to be hard on myself and perfection cannot be a goal. There are still real-life structural barriers in place that we have to knock down. For example this recent disclosure about Wells Fargo Bank pushing sub-prime loans onto Blacks. It’s either outright racial prejudice, racialized sexism via dismissal of women with more traditional African features or further disdain amongst Blacks. As a woman if our outer presentation doesn’t reflect our truest inner selves do we have to have that held against us until and unless we conform? Would part of the reason for that be a reaction to all of the things I’ve discussed so far?

We may not agree on how we want people to get to their own “promised land” but I can say unequivocally for myself that I do want it to happen. I like Black people after all. I can still demand respect be given to me as African-American woman though. I’m not sure I can say the same for everyone who’s claiming to be empowering for all of us, what “all” they’re referring to. 


***Just wanted to add in case it wasn’t clear that we have to look to our inner motivations, spiritual beliefs and life plans as we continually evaluate where we are in our lives, where we want to go and how to get there. Sometimes our plans may place limitations on what we can actually accomplish, sometimes we have to re-route our paths.


There may never be a singular consensus for what path is best. We have to make the choices that will hopefully work for us and our own best interests, not for the comfort and convenience of others. Not even when they claim to know what we “need” to do.

Bookmark and Share

Are Blacks Politically & Personally Prepared For the Multi-Racial Revolution?

So I’ve been sitting on this for nearly two months. With the conversations that have taken place the past week or so I feel I’m somewhat better able to articulate my thoughts on this. This is an exploration of ideas versus a set standard of do’s and don’ts. There’s a political component at stake where we must learn to navigate through another facet of an established infrastructure we may be vehemently opposed to. We may not have figured out how to make it work to our benefit yet. There’s a personal component where we may wish to compete but may not be prepared and have to develop a winning strategy. Or we could just be mad about the whole thing. 
Is this the beginning of the end? Some people want separate categorizations for biracial and multiracial children. The ones that can will be folded into the white masses (as they will make accommodations for their dwindling numbers to continue their dominance) while others will be rejected and not allowed to do so.  Is this a reliable scenario for banding together or a consolation prize tactic for retaining certain privileges?

From WAPO: Public schools in the Washington region and elsewhere are abandoning their check-one-box approach to gathering information about race and ethnicity in an effort to develop a more accurate portrait of classrooms transformed by immigration and interracial marriage. Next year, they will begin a separate count of students who are of more than one race.

I see this as a multi-layered scenario. There’s genetics, culture, historical acumen, modern strategies and choice. One consideration is about needing to recognize diversity of thought, outlook, experience and birth. Another is about outside attempts at diversionary tactics and divisiveness. Finally there’s the internal development we must do to advance. Some don’t agree on tactics while others don’t think certain efforts need to be made at all. This isn’t about setting people apart, denying parentage or putting down some in favor of others. This is about having a reality check. 
Historically we can look at many people who were pioneers of the advancement of colored people who’s appearance could’ve lent them to be viewed as white: Thurgood Marshall, Adam Clayton Powell, Lena Horne and plenty of others. There may have been less options but they chose to align with the “Black” categorization for the uplift of all.  I wonder how many people with their phenotype would willingly do so today when they could (rightfully) claim everything and the kitchen sink. I can understand why things that took place in the past no longer work today. I can also see where we need to stop playing old scripts. There have always been those who had a vested interest in establishing a hierarchy that they benefitted from (i.e paper bag test). I don’t see that trend ending any time soon so we know why that expression about “skin folk not always kin folk” exists. 
There are those whose phenotype lends towards a Black categorization who do not want to be Black. They were taught to have disdain for the parts of their heritage deemed less than. They’ve continued to do so after the age of consent.  They’re not going to be considered “white” under most circumstances when their biracial makeup includes any direct/recent African heritage. 
Since whites are supposedly diminishing numerically they’ve upped the ante to change the Census for their benefit. (Some) Blacks have always banded together in solidarity for political and social purposes when set in opposition to whites. Intra-racially it was a different story. Those who were seeking advancement for themselves fought to separate themselves from the masses. This practice began during the forced enslavement of Africans. Of course the irony is how whites were fighting for independence while keeping people hostage but that’s why we need to really pay attention to our history and see how the few exert power over the masses. 
We need to have our own power tactics in place. The best and brightest want to ensure their survival. They will have laws enacted and other societal traditions that maximize growth. Groups of people who thrive are not allowed to be left to their own individual devices inasmuch as the majority don’t do things that threaten the collective.  
Black political power has been divided, short-sighted and focused on short-term goals. Those that declared themselves the “elites” of the bunch used phenotype to deny inclusion of a majority. How were they ever truly allies and why would those belonging outside those groups be able to trust an alliance built of a lie? Individuals have found ways around it, but what of the base? Sometimes it’s been more beneficial to work with those outside these groups.  Thomas Jefferson went to great efforts to ensure that his progeny with Sally Hemmings would get the maximum benefits allowed under miscegenation laws and for those whose phenotype lent itself to be considered “white”. Why must we still discuss advancing like it was a new concept?
In a related argument you have Blacks with American Indian heritage who are being denied tribal membership so the majority can retain its leverage. Via Racewire:

Does affirming indigenous identity and sovereignty necessitate drawing boundaries? In excluding Blacks from nationhood, are the Cherokee replicating historical injustices they themselves suffered? Should a shared legacy of dispossession encourage unity, even if it means grappling with a historical blight?

There’s a personal component at play here, an emotional tie. Then there’s looking to the future and taking steps towards advancement. There’s a few discussions going on a some blogs that seek to empower Black women about how to navigate that Blackness, what emphasis should be placed on it, how to move out of a narrow definition of it, how to accept all of our different life experiences and accepting our different heritages/legacies/ethnicities. How do you elevate yourself if you’re stuck in the past? How do you catch up in the game of life when you didn’t know the particular game to begin with? Who are you measuring yourself against? Is feeling frustrated appropriate? 
When you have a large portion of the “Black” population that doesn’t know their legacy and full spectrum heritage how does analysis of embracing power tactics really take root without addressing it? Some people may be able to move forward onto the next phase of development but what of the masses? If they’ve fallen down and the minority decides to leave them do we just say “too bad”? Then why even present it as collective advancement when it’s individual. 
Finally, how does one group who may not consider themselves a group work within that group as well as work with those completely outside that group, survive and thrive? Choosing to negotiate between cultures is one thing, having the government fragmenting it is another. I feel as if I may have presented this as a circle with no exit path for the majority. I can’t say I believe that will be of benefit to us all, but it may lead to a more productive future. At least I hope so.

Bookmark and Share

African-American, Black or Other: Who Are We?

Are you aware the categorization of race and ethnicity in this country is different from other countries? In the UK it’s Caribbean, African or Other. They use the term Black & Minority Ethnic (MBE). Having slavery declared illegal (but allowing the “lesser” evil of colonialization) set up a different dynamic than the United States. That is a stark contrast to the “average” Black person in the US. There is much confusion about who we are – and aren’t. If I make a mistake in discussing this that’s okay because this is something we need to hash out.

I want to explore the role of race and ethnicity and the impact it has had on the Black people born in this country whose ancestors go back around 5 generations or more. I’m estimating the specific generations that were here during the time when they were enslaved (or free and trying to stay that way)! First of all I’m still not sure how I wish to refer to myself. Black or African-American seem to be my only options. We don’t all share the same ethnicity but we can claim some commonality, can’t we? Many of us can do so with pride, but many of us cannot. I believe part of the reason is that we’re not all sure what our family’s specific ethnicity is.

I have wondered about my own family gene pool and how the women of my lineage fared but have seen it as a potentially emotional and financially taxing undertaking. Having those conversations about being a Sojourner, the Death of Black Unity and asking What About the Future Generations as well as How Do I Pick A Quality Mate at various blogs has challenged me in so many ways this past year. Believe it or not I went from Entertainment/Gossip blogs to a few political ones due to the election, to those that ask the tough questions and demand that I do internal work. 

This is despite that fact that I’ve already done a LOT of internal work and highly recommend everyone see a qualified mental health professional one can feel comfortable with. Even if I had all the answers I’m not sure how much emphasis would be appropriate because of the unresolved racism that exists externally via white supremacy and internally through the Black on Black intra-racial/ethnic/gender/class conflicts. Doing that internal work and always being interested in seeking justice is what led me to hosting my own blog.

Some of us may claim we’re “Black” and that’s it. I refuse to use the lower-case “b” in writing about us because I’ve always considered that “rule” something white people did to keep the inferiority complex going.  It’s easy to say a concession has been made by the use of a lower-case “w” for white, but when you’re running things you can make such superficial gestures. Which term embodies the qualities we’re looking for?

I think I can safely state when some of us claim “Black” as our entire racial AND ethnic distinction it’s because many of us may not know our gene pool or lineage past the 3rd and possibly the 4th generation. Depending on the relationships forged many of us simply do not know: unless our ancestors did something extra-special (which implies that surviving throughout Reconstruction, Jim Crow & Civil Rights wasn’t special enough) or they TALKED about it and had documents to show for it.

Depending on one’s class status and point of view, a person mired in daily financial struggles or other situations may not see it as a priority (though they SHOULD) to put the time and money into the necessary research to find out their full heritage spectrum and perhaps may not how to either. Dare I say a lot of Black people do not know who their “people” are or what they did to survive. This lack of knowledge fuels a lot of the embarrassing patterns I discussed in yesterday’s post.

I want to make it clear that by using Black I’m referring to those whose ancestors were forcibly brought here to the USA, survived being enslaved and built this country. Many of us  share a common African heritage of being the descendants of those enslaved but we were dropped off in different parts of the world. The US Census calls it something else, but since race is a made up construct I say we take the word back and make it work for our benefit! Some may use African-American and even prefer it. Those first few survivors who had their individual cultures and languages wiped out were forced to become reconditioned blank slates for the purposes of providing labor and breeding.  People were solely focused on freeing themselves NOT on their various ethnicities. That may not the experience or intention of every individual Black person who set foot here but it is more than likely the majority one.

Slavery is seen by many as painful, shameful and something we had to “overcome”. Thinking of it as something a strong, resilient people SURVIVED because they FOUGHT TO LIVE is NOT the way many of us think about it. There was so much shame being carried around by many of our forebears that we were taught to look forward and keep it moving. It was like escaping Sodom and Gomorrah: if we looked back we’d turn into a pillar of salt. At the time that was part of that Black Unity survival tactic but it is choking us now.

There were also legal barriers put in place to hold our ancestors back post-Slavery as well. Land was stolen. Miscegenation laws meant some of us were legally barred from entering into a marriage contracts with others who weren’t just like us. We couldn’t own guns. 

Many people who may be able to easily identify their various ethnic markers can do so with pride, but some do it with a certain animosity towards others who can’t. White supremacy has aided and abetted many. The enactment of the paper bag tests of the past speak to that. The music videos of today show how much worse it has become. We may all be “Black” but some of us are looking for a little something extra to add-on and to put on a pedestal. That extra can be beneficial for some in a patriarchal supremacist society in the same way women share a common gender but some women (usually white) are still valued more than others.

Would those excluded from the ones that enacted these tests think they were part of a collective that could share common goals but had differences or would they think they were being excluded by those that wanted to be set apart and favored? Wasn’t it with a certain reluctance that those who sought to benefit in some way decided that a collective would have a greater impact in addressing systematic racism? Haven’t some of those “Others” decided they knew what was best and would tell EVERYBODY what to do and how to act? 

Aren’t these the same tactics MEN used in addressing racial inequality by telling women to be silent and do as they said and they’d take care of EVERYBODY? We can’t acknowledge all of our “parts” without recognizing those that are in fact some looking to serve the interests of their sub-group of class/ethnicity/gender/religion/skin shade. Whatever it was that they placed in high regard.

Isn’t it true that those Blacks who know their ethnicity and/or lineage are the exception and not the rule in this country? If so doesn’t that knowledge also come with those belonging to a different class structure? It’s certainly convenient to be part of the collective when it benefits your specific ethnic group, but isn’t it also true that once that benefit ends so would the desire to be part of  that collective  – for many? When you can claim to be “Black/African-American” but also “Other” that isn’t a level playing field. If you were the beneficiary of the longer end of the see-saw how many would voluntarily seek to even it?

If those additional things weren’t considered so valuable then would people have placed such importance in them? If by virtue of your birth you get to skip ahead of the line, even if it’s behind another group can you deny that you received some benefit and still have an authentic relationship with the ones who are behind you? Or would you instead like to find out who’s in line AHEAD of you?

Yes we can pay for mater/pater DNA testing and do research. The internet has made that a lot easier now. I’m saying the thought doesn’t even occur to a lot of people because they think their feelings of shame and inferiority are almost exclusively due to white racism. This is why these intra-Black issues have not been addressed and why so many act out. We know something is wrong but haven’t figured out what “It” is.

Imagine if you hadn’t been exposed to all aspects of your heritage or had parents who didn’t really want to be Black/African-American and used your ethnicity as a cover to declare yourselves “special”. We can certainly say, “well snap out of it now that you’re an adult” but adding that on top of external obstructions, bad habits, apathy, etc is a LOT to wade through. Then add fatherlessness (which is a very common but not exclusive situation) on top of it.

Being educated doesn’t erase that. Having $$ in the bank doesn’t erase that. Being famous doesn’t erase that. (Click down to my inclusion of the Chris Rock lineage discovery moment in yesterday’s post). Any achievements you make may seem somewhat hollow or incomplete. So if under those circumstances you can claim an ethnicity that is different from many people you may know most people will do so with pride but also are running away from some aspect of themselves at the same time. They don’t want to be like those “other Blacks/African-Americans” or have these internal conflicts. They want to be special. Feel better. I believe it is ALL tied together.

I would like to say I have it all figured out but I don’t. Unlike so many Blacks who claim American Indian heritage we actually do have some on both sides of my family, but that isn’t an attempt on my part to make myself an “other”. I know the Cherokee Nation is NOT taking applications at this time! I have to confess that I do NOT know a huge portion of the rest of my family’s ethnicity. Our family – like many others – was too busy hiding and lying about numerous things. Think about how many of us had relatives that could pass for white and did so. It was a matter of life or death at that time. It also meant keeping it a secret and losing an physical and psychic connection. To think that has not had a negative impact on us would be a lie. Yet this isn’t the experience of many other Blacks. Trying to get my grandparents to tell me anything about their childhood and other relatives was like pulling teeth. Nobody wanted to talk about the past. So we were what I’d call a “generic” Black i.e NOT WHITE and IN SURVIVAL MODE.

At some point these survival tactics are no longer useful. Hence the need to move forward. Not everyone is doing so with full disclosure and honesty. I see the “I Am ANYTHING Other than Black” dynamic played out. I have male relatives who’ve mated with Black women who were Caribbean and African respectively. The dynamic of separation and “othering” was often prevalent, first in their choice of mate (a non-African American woman) and in raising their children as one said “like a white person”. Now what the heck was that supposed to mean? They were alluding to having a revolving wardrobe of new clothes, extra-curricular activities and other amenities. They did not want to accept how wrong their thinking was. I should also mention that while these men mated and had children with these women they did not marry them. So if we’re going to assign certain “good” behavior belonging to whites exclusively it hadn’t occurred to them that they would’ve been husbands and not a baby-daddy? 

Some may ask why there shouldn’t be some distinction and I agree – there should be. Not just ethnicity or class but of who the majority “Black” population was that built the United States. Credit should be given to those of us whose direct ancestors put blood sweat and tears here and made the ultimate investment – but whose descendants have been denied inheritance benefits. We are uniquely born Americans and provided the wealth and opportunities that many other people’s current progeny get to benefit from though NOT OUR OWN.

If we do some research and find out our ethnicity is more closely aligned with some rather than others in the future that is fine, but let it be clear that it was a core group of people who DID NOT KNOW ANY OF THIS who were the ones that did the bulk of the labor and sacrificing. I get to claim them though because I came from them, not some other Blacks who can currently acknowledge their various classes and ethnicities from this Island or that set of circumstances. After all we’re still ONE, right?

From Wikipedia 

In 1988 Jesse Jackson urged Americans to use the term African American because the term has a historical cultural base. Since then African American and black have essentially a coequal status. There is still much controversy over which term is more appropriate. Some strongly reject the term African American in preference for black citing that they have little connection with Africa.[who?] Others believe the term black is inaccurate because African Americans have a variety of skin tones.[44][not in citation given] Surveys show that when interacting with each other African Americans prefer the term black, as it is associated with intimacy and familiarity. The term “African American” is preferred for public and formal use.[45] The appropriateness of the term “African American” is further confused, however, by increases in black immigrants from Africa, the Caribbean and Latin America. The more recent black immigrants may sometimes view themselves, and be viewed, as culturally distinct from native descendants of African slaves.[46]

The U.S. census race definitions says a black is a person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. It includes people who indicate their race as “Black, African Am., or Negro,” or who provide written entries such as African American, Afro American, Kenyan, Nigerian, or Haitian. However, the Census Bureau notes that these classifications are socio-political constructs and should not be interpreted as scientific or anthropological.[47]

A considerable portion of the U.S. population identified as black actually have some Native American or European American ancestry. For instance, genetic studies of African American people show an ancestry that is on average 17-18% European.[48]

Bookmark and Share