I know this is apparently the biggest news story of the year, but is it really such the crime against humanity as it’s been implied? David Letterman was allegedly approached by the ex-boyfriend of one of his staffers who demanded $2M to keep silent about his past sexual relationship with her. So Letterman “revealed” that he’s had sex with numerous women who work for him and that gets swept under the rug. Can you say Fall Guy?
Considering the fact Letterman had briefly mentioned how he almost got “fired” during the Madonna interview a few days ago I think it’s very interesting indeed how male privilege and white protectionism kicks in during certain times. Letterman was referring to the Palin incident when he thought he could drag her daughters into his criticism of her and got the smackdown of his life. It has still had a profound effect on him since he obviously thought he could publicly degrade white womanhood but found out otherwise.
What I now find very interesting is how used he is to degrading them in his personal life. Or should I say professional life. No wonder he was surprised. Look what he’s been allowed to get away with for the better part of nearly three decades? He has a history of “dating” the women who work for him. What male boss is allowed to troll for dates and girlfriends from his pool of employees without violating some laws?
His current wife is a former staffer in fact. I think there’s something in the CBS water because isn’t the head of the network married to one of his staffers as well? (Les Moonves and Julie Chen). The fact that Letterman owns his show yet is so intimately involved with staff under employment contracts with the network – owned by Viacom speaks volumes about what guidelines are supposed to be in place to protect women as opposed to what actually goes on.
Whether these women enter into relationships “willingly” isn’t the point. Remember when Bill O’Reilly was busted for sexing one of his female producers, had abusive conversations caught on tape and Fox had to make a multi-million dollar payout? It also seems to me there must be some serious employment discrimination going on whereby certain women are hired to begin with. There’s the question of diversity – or really the lack of – when the women chosen have similar backgrounds. It’s one thing for a savvy woman to position herself to have access to a powerful man. It’s something else entirely when part of the unspoken job description involves giving sexual favors and attention to one.